Global PV updates, distilled - powered by our community
Hi,
Quick catch-up on what moved this week β and, more importantly, what it means for you in practice.
As always, thank you to everyone who shared links, documents, and local insights by email or in Slack . This newsletter exists because you surface whatβs changing before it becomes a surprise.
π Start with the 10-Second Summary below, then dive deeper into the details if something affects your work.
β±οΈ 10-Second Summary (Read This First)
If you read nothing else this week:
- π§π· Brazil β Anvisa published a Q&A on RDC 945/2024 / IN 338/2024.
βUse it as a checklist for DDCM, DEEC, and substantial amendments β it reflects real reviewer pain points.
- π¨π Switzerland β Swissmedic rewrote its signal reporting guidance (effective 1 Feb 2026).
βSignal timelines, Day 0 definitions, PI update workflows, and authority-driven signals all changed.
- πΉπ· Turkey β New clinical practice guideline for regenerative & advanced therapies.
βExplicit PV obligations now apply β βnon-trial useβ does not mean βno PV.β
- πͺπ¨ Ecuador β Updated instructions for SAE/SUSAR reporting and safety follow-up in clinical trials.
βCheck timelines and formats if Ecuador is in scope.
- πͺπΊ EU β EMA updates on signal detection post-EV pilot, ESI contact points, EV/EV-SSA data protection, and EVVet3 system changes.
βMostly operational β but relevant for inspections and audits.
Details and links below π
π This Period's Highlights
π§π· Brazil β Anvisa Q&A on RDC 945/2024 & IN 338/2024 (Clinical Trials)
Whatβs newβ
Anvisa has published an official Questions & Answers document clarifying how RDC 945/2024 and IN 338/2024 should be applied in real submissions.
This isnβt a new regulation β itβs Anvisa explaining where sponsors keep getting stuck.
Why this mattersβ
The Q&A is built directly from:
- recurring deficiencies in DDCM and DEEC submissions
- frequent issues with substantial amendments and investigational product changes
In other words: this is Anvisa telling you why your last submission may have been delayed.
What to do now
-
Use this Q&A as a pre-submission checklist, especially for:
- DDCM scope and structure
- DEEC content
- substantial protocol amendments
- substantial IMP modifications
- Donβt treat it as βnice to readβ β this is effectively a window into Anvisa reviewersβ expectations.
- Remember: itβs non-binding, but ignoring it increases the risk of technical questions.
π¨π Switzerland β Swissmedic overhauls signal reporting guidance (effective 1 Feb 2026)
Whatβs newβ
Swissmedic has fully revised:
This is not cosmetic β timelines, obligations, and workflows changed.
Key changes you should know
- Clearer start/end of signal reporting obligations
-
Signals from authorities
- No reporting obligation for MAHs of KAS without innovation, biosimilars, and co-marketing products if PI is updated by conformation
- Signals without serious risk: reporting deadline extended from 30 β 90 days
- Day 0 redefined for EMA PSUR/PSUSA outcomes
-
Product information updates
- No longer submitted in parallel with signal reports
- Risk minimisation now handled fully inside the signal evaluation procedure
-
New signal evaluation procedure
- If Swissmedic agrees with βno action needed,β silence after 6 months = consent
-
KAS with innovation
- Conformation is not allowed β MAHs must actively implement PI changes
-
New publication stream
- βSafety Update β Information for healthcare professionalsβ
What to do now
- Update Swiss local signal SOPs β this version changes assumptions many teams rely on
-
Re-train anyone handling:
- authority-driven signals
- PSUR/PSUSA outcomes
- PI update workflows
- Replace the old Signal Notification Form before February 2026
Whatβs newβ
TITCK has published a Clinical Practice Guideline for regenerative medicine and advanced therapeutic medicinal products, in force since 23 January 2026.
This sits outside classical clinical trials β closer to hospital exemption-type use.
Why this matters
- The guideline introduces explicit pharmacovigilance obligations
- Adverse reactions from these clinical applications must be reported
- Ongoing safety follow-up and periodic reporting are expected
What to do now
-
If you support ATMPs or regenerative therapies in Turkey:
- review Article 14 and Annex 3 (PV / biovigilance section)
- check whether your current PV system captures these cases
- Donβt assume βnon-trial useβ = βno PVβ
πͺπΊ EU β Signal detection, EV data protection & system updates
A few smaller but relevant updates you may want on your radar:
πͺπ¨ Ecuador β Updated clinical-trial safety reporting instructions
Two newly issued (but easy to miss) documents from ARCSA:
What to do now
-
If Ecuador is in scope for your trials:
- update timelines and report formats
- check alignment with global DSUR / SUSAR processes
π£οΈ Join the Conversation & Contribute
What did you think of this weekβs edition? Was it helpful?
Hit reply to share your thoughts or tell us if we missed an update.
β
If you found this useful, please share it with one PV colleague or join our growing Slack workspace to discuss these changes.
Until next week - stay compliant, stay curious.
βοΈ Disclaimer
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional or legal advice.
All summaries are based on publicly available regulatory information. Always verify requirements with the relevant authority or qualified professional before implementation.
RegIntelHub assumes no liability for actions taken based on this content.